Category Archives: Reviews

My Five Top Pics from Tribeca ’22

Still spinning from this year’s Tribeca Film Festival, where I watched 50 movies in 2 weeks.
Here are my 5 top pics:

ATTACHMENT (Gabriel Bier Gislason, 2022) – Genre bending Danish, Jewish-Queer-Romance-Horror-Comedy (set partly in Stamford Hill!)

BLAZE (Del Kathryn Barton, 2022) – Brutal, astonishing, and “unapologetically handmade” coming-of-age drama from Australia.

A LOVE SONG (Max Walker-Silverman, 2022) – At a Colorado campsite a woman awaits a visitor from her past. Beautifully shot story with a lot of charm. Dale Dickey’s performance is captivating.

FAMILY DINNER (Peter Hengl, 2022) – Tightly crafted, clever horror from Austria. Strong all round performances.

LIQUOR STORE DREAMS (So Yun Um, 2022) – Informative and intimate Doc on Korean owned liquor stores in LA and their changing role in local communities.

Bonus mention: SOMEWHERE IN QUEENS (Ray Romano, 2022) – Sweet family dramedy with spritely cast. Each character feels fully realized (and recognizable). Queens finally gets its movie!

Comments Off on My Five Top Pics from Tribeca ’22

Filed under Movies

“Not My Place to Question…” Learning the Language of Subservience and Complicity in THE ASSISTANT

Thought provoking observations on THE ASSISTANT (Kitty Green, 2019) from students on my NYU Summer Course about the recent rise of women-centric film and television. The film is part of a growing number of tv shows and movies that form something of a post #metoo cycle.

It proves instructive to watch the movie alongside the British Channel 4 documentary WORKING WITH WEINSTEIN. The doc includes interviews with Weinstein’s former assistants. Several of these employees’ stories  illuminate moments in this film, and vice versa.

Technically a tight, well-made movie, the film lends itself to close readings like this one here.

CONTAINS SPOLIERS:

In class I screened the below two clips to illustrate the process by which the titular assistant, Jane (Julia Garner), is coached in an office language of submissiveness and complicity that facilitates the boss’s continued abusive and sexually predatory behavior.

A hostile male coworker sets Jane up by fielding her a call from the boss’s furious wife. Jane unsuccessfully attempts to pacify the wife, who angrily hangs up. A key cut follows: The film cuts abruptly from a head-on mid-shot of Jane to this disorientating low angle shot; this cut when compounded with the startling phone ring, and terrified look on Jane’s face creates a moment of horror. At times the film borrows conventions from the horror movie genre. For example, we never fully see the boss in THE ASSISTANT just as classic horror movies hold back and create suspense by refraining from fully revealing the monster. Alternatively, one might consider that by never presenting the boss the film prohibits any form of sympathy for him, or “himpathy.” For further discussion on monsters and himpathy in media representations of abusers see Dr. Karen Boyle’s blogpost Of Monsters and Bombshells
As the boss directs a diatribe of insults and expletives towards Jane the camera cuts to the above close-up connoting Jane’s interiority, and inviting the viewer to connect with her. Register Jane’s pale sweater and complexion which make her almost disappear into the background of some shots, underscoring her insignificance in the office, and invisibility to many of the company’s employees.
Continue reading

Comments Off on “Not My Place to Question…” Learning the Language of Subservience and Complicity in THE ASSISTANT

Filed under Blog, Films

HBO: Aesthetics, Narratives, and Business Practices

Stoked to be teaching my HBO course at NYU in the fall. [taught fall ’18, and ’19]

Screen Shot 2018-03-01 at 10.08.44 PM

Over the past few decades the premium cable and satellite network, Home Box Office Inc. has developed American audience tastes and raised expectations for quality television programming. A long-term proponent of the “prestige show,” HBO repeatedly made the case that premium television was worth its monthly subscription fee; in doing so HBO laid the foundations for subscription streaming services such as Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon, all of which now also produce their own exclusive, original content. Responding recently to the growing competition from these sites, HBO restated its familiar rhetoric announcing it would focus even more on quality and exercise a greater selective content strategy.

What is a HBO show? And, why have HBO’s shows mattered so much in American cultural life? This course asserts that HBO produces a distinctive and recognizable brand. Beyond the boasted high production value evident in their often auteur controlled aesthetic, HBO’s shows share specific thematic concerns, narratives, and philosophy as they build a complex picture of US life, telling in long-form serials, stories from America’s past and present. Screenings will include some of the network’s most popular shows from a variety of genres, such as: The Wire, Girls, Entourage, Westworld, Game of Thrones, and Last Week Tonight. The class will also address the company’s changing corporate model and operating structure, along with its position in the global media market.

HBO Syllabus -Miller

Leave a Comment

Filed under Movies

Around the World in 16 Weeks

Currently teaching at NYU my survey course: International Cinema: 1960 to Present

NYU International Cinema(Screenshots taken from three movies I adore: Cruel Story of Youth (Nagisa Oshima, 1960, Japan), Touki Bouki (Djibril diop Mambéty, 1973, Senegal), Close Up (Abbas Kiarostami, 1990, Iran)

Film scholar James Tweedie observes that in our “tendency to catalog films within familiar geographical, industrial, or linguistic boundaries,” we overlook “their most innovative and revelatory dimensions: their repetition and simultaneity in various locations and their resistance to the habitual attribution of local place-name.”

This course will oscillate between the national and the transnational to provide an overview of networks, trends, connections, and interactions within global cinema from 1960 onwards. The course will introduce key concepts and methods for approaching the study of world cinema. We will trace prominent national and transnational post-war movements that challenged Hollywood’s aesthetics and values. Many of the films we will watch in this course share similar thematic and aesthetic concerns. Concerns that cross borders include: postwar trauma and historical revisionism, the relationship between politics and aesthetics, intergenerational conflict and youth culture, post-colonialism and growing national consciousness, gender oppression and degrees of liberation, and the ambivalence towards or embrace of global capitalism. We will also consider the growing prestige of art cinema and film festival circuits.

By the end of this course you will have the knowledge and vocabulary required to analyze and write about international films within their broader cultural, historical, and aesthetic contexts, while remaining ever-mindful of the complexities and problematic nature of what it means to discuss “global cinema.”

Syllabus: NYU International Cinema 1960 to Present – Miller

Leave a Comment

Filed under Movies

Art Institute of Chicago: “Nothing Personal”

This week I’m in Chicago!

“Nothing Personal”

During my visit to the Art Institute of Chicago (AIC), I was delighted to stumble upon a provocative exhibition relating to one of my favorite movies: Cheryl Dunye’s The Watermelon Woman (1996). The exhibit “Nothing Personal” interrogates the politics of the archive and includes the fictional, photographic archive of Fae Richards (Lisa Marie Bronson), who is an elusive, but central character in Dunye’s movie. For the movie, artist Zoe Leonard created an archive charting Fae Richards’s life. It’s these fabricated documents that are now on display at the AIC.

The Watermelon Woman follows young Black, lesbian filmmaker Cheryl (Cheryl Dunye), who works in a video store in Philadelphia with her best friend, and occasional camera assistant, Tamara (Valarie Walker). When she’s not working, Cheryl is making a documentary film about the late Fae Richards, a Black actress who featured in Hollywood 1930s movies playing “Mammie” roles and who only ever received credit as the “Watermelon Woman.” Over the course of her research Cheryl discovers that Richards was romantically involved with movie director Martha Page – a type of Dorothy Arzner figure. Cheryl shoots her documentary on video, and the clips from her film are intercut with Cheryl’s confessional video diary, real archival footage, and the faux, fabricated footage from Richards’s movies.

Cheryl records her video diary, while surrounded by her archive of Fae Richards memorabilia.

Cheryl records her video diary, while surrounded by her archive of Fae Richards memorabilia. The Watermelon Woman (1996).

During Cheryl’s quest to make her documentary, the film repeatedly and brilliantly challenges archival practices. Cheryl visits a multitude of sites in pursuit of information about Richards’s life. She first pays a visit to Lee Edwards’s home: Edwards is a Black film historian and collector of race movies. While Edwards’s collection is vast, when Cheryl asks him about the Watermelon Woman he tells her “women are not my specialty.” Cheryl and Tamara next visit the public library where at the reference desk they encounter a snooty white male librarian, coded as gay. He tells the women that the library doesn’t hold any reference category on Black women in film.  A further excursion takes Cheryl to the Center for Lesbian Info and Technology (cheekily referred to as C.L.I.T.). This haphazardly organized, comically bureaucratic archive run by an all-volunteer collective holds a few items on Richards’s life, but Cheryl is forbidden from using them in her film (Many of these photographs appear on exhibition today at AIC). While the movie makes a serious political point about the difficulties of conducting research on history’s most marginalized people and explores a Black filmmaker’s complex relationship with America’s exploitative movie heritage, Dunye’s film never loses its sense of cinephilia and fun.

Cheryl

Cheryl is scolded by one of the archivists at C.L.I.T. for attempting to videotape items from the Fae Richards Collection. The Watermelon Woman (1996).

The mise-en-scene of the video store where Cheryl works also resembles something of an archive due to the stacks and stacks of videotapes looming behind the store’s front desk. In addition to archivists, the clerks perform the roles of film curators, programmers, and reviewers. They order and collect the non-mainstream videos they want to see (many of these are lesbian and pornographic). They also advise customers on what movies they should rent, and in the “two for one video deal” Cheryl suggests movies that will complement each other. The Watermelon Woman is a movie indebted to videotape, but it’s also something of a celebration of video’s aesthetic and the medium itself.  In the nineties, the innovations and affordability of the camcorder along with the availability of video rentals permitted a new film culture to flourish and enabled the New Queer Cinema movement. A movement indisputably enriched by Dunye’s contributions.

Cheryl and Tamara working together in the video store. The Watermelon Woman (1996).

Cheryl and Tamara working together in the video store. The Watermelon Woman (1996).

If you watch The Watermelon Woman today you may be struck by how the movie hasn’t dated, and this seems quite a feat given its relationship to videotape! I could almost believe Cheryl and Tamara are out there right now working in the last video store in Philadelphia. But rather than timelessness, perhaps this is a matter of timeliness given the parallels between The Watermelon Woman and Netflix’s hit show Orange is the New Black (2014-). To draw just one superficial comparison, the relationship and banter that Cheryl and Tamara share in the video store very much resembles the friendship and back-and-forth between Taystee and Poussey, who work together in the library in OITNB. Unsurprisingly, I’m not the first person to have made this connection. Journalists have asked Dunye to comment on the similarities between her work and OITNB, especially since Dunye actually made a movie about a women’s prison. Thankfully, Dunye’s nineties movies seem to be receiving greater recognition today. As critic Ruby Rich notes about New Queer Cinema – the term she coined – “the movement…was always eleventy-zillion light-years ahead of the mainstream.” It therefore seems about the right time for the AIC to put on this exhibition that partly pays homage to The Watermelon Woman.

You can currently stream The Watermelon Woman on Amazon Prime.

Nighthawks

Another highlight of my visit to the AIC was encountering Edward Hopper’s celebrated painting Nighthawks (1947).

Edward Hopper

What you don’t get a sense of from reproductions of the painting is the luminosity of the yellow. I stood four rooms back and could still see the brightly lit diner glowing in the distance.

Nighthawks Glowing in the Distance. On Display at AIC.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Events, Films, Reviews

Welcome!

I am a film industry researcher  based in Santa Monica, CA. I hold a PhD from NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts/Martin Scorsese Department of Cinema Studies.

I’ve taught television and film courses at New York University, Seton Hall University, Brooklyn College, and CUNY Hunter. I’m also a video editor (Avid, Premiere). Prior to relocating to the US I worked as a project manager in the video games industry.

When I’m not watching or writing about movies, I like to read film industry trade journals, novels, and historical non-fiction. I love cats and travel. 

You can reach me here: LinkedIn. Please feel free to connect.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Movies

Direct to Your TV: NYU’s “University Broadcast Lab” (1969 -1983)

ubl

For the 50th Anniversary of NYU Tisch School of the Arts my colleague and I have been commissioned to research the history of the School. We’re primarily focusing on locating and preserving audio-visual materials that record early faculty and student contributions. So far we’ve made some pretty exciting discoveries!

One portion of the School’s history that is proving particularly intriguing pertains to a series of programs made for a long-term project entitled “University Broadcast Lab.”

Between 1969-81 an extremely productive collaboration existed between the non-commercial, local station WNYC-TV and a 26-week color television course taught by Professors Richard Goggin and Irving Falk. For a number of months a year WNYC-TV would twice-weekly broadcast on Channel 31 the original and imaginative output made by students of this class. The first episode to air was entitled “Feiffer and Friends,” written and featuring -then student – Billy Crystal.

To exemplify the scope, innovation, and ambition of these television programs I’ve included below a random sampling of titles along with their descriptions:

  • Chase Newhart’s Beat the Draft (taping date: Jan 14 1970, air date: 10:30 pm, Jan 25 1970). This satiric program is a take-off on the game show format  – the winner gets a deferment, the loser is drafted to fight in Vietnam.
  • Bob Ackerman and Don Brockway’s Inside Television (air date: Feb 22 1971). This comedy-satire takes the viewer on a tour of the inside of his television set where he will learn about the work of dedicated people (called “Nurns”) who make their homes inside electronic devices. The Nurns explain the gadgets inside the TV set and give their opinions on some of the shows viewers watch.
  • Sheva Farkas’s We the People (air date: Mar 15 1971). An original drama about the confusion of ideas and the lack of ability to either compromise or listen to opposite points of view, the program revolves around the issues of racism, radicalism and the war in Vietnam.
  • Electa Brown and John Homs’s What? Your Favorite Subject is Math – The Village Charrette (May 24 1971). Brown interviews Patricia Flynn, Chairman of the Greenwich Village Charrette Steering Committee and Charles Patrick Bell, a 7-year-old first grader at P.S. 3 in the Village.

Continue reading

Comments Off on Direct to Your TV: NYU’s “University Broadcast Lab” (1969 -1983)

Filed under Blog, Television

An Evening of Stargazing

Authors Discuss How to Write and Publish in the Field of Star Studies

star

“’British Film Institute Star Studies Panel’ (from left to right) Martin Shingler, Cynthia Baron, Jacqueline Reich, Keri Walsh).” Photo courtesy of Fordham University English Department.

On the evening of Friday, September 19 at Fordham University’s Lincoln Center, I attended an engaging and productive panel discussion entitled “British Film Institute Star Studies.” The session focused on “the thorniest questions encountered in star studies” contributing to Fordham’s three-day conference “Rethinking Realist Acting,” organized to confront established notions about realism in film and theater.

The panelists, speaking from personal experience, introduced some of the challenges scholars face when writing about a screen star and suggested various methodological approaches to negotiating them. The four panel speakers were the editor and authors of books on movie stars, three speakers had written BFI series books. Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Events

How Americans Came to View Old Movies

Eric Hoyt’s original focus and smart approach provides a new perspective on what we may have considered familiar film history.

5176WeSiRNL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_

Eric Hoyt, Hollywood Vault: Film Libraries Before Home Video, University of California Press, 2014, 288 pp.

As a film historian I think about movies a lot, however I’ve never been more conscious of the physical size and weight of film until a recent visit to a collector’s apartment in Manhattan. Standing in his kitchenette – one of the many rooms given over to his film collection – he explained: “I removed the stove for more space. I couldn’t use it anyway because the heat would damage the film. Now I just microwave everything.” I returned a look that expressed something of both awe and concern. The space, effort, and cost required to preserve film proves considerable so if you’re not storing it out of love it needs to have value. While individuals may be susceptible to the former, the latter motivates corporations. “When did old movies become valuable?” This is the question Eric Hoyt asks at the start of his book Hollywood Vault, which traces the changing valuation of film libraries across six decades from their emergence in the silent era through to their acquisition by conglomerates in the late sixties (2). Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books, Reviews

“The Andy Griffith Show” Receives Scholarly Attention

Pérez Firmat’s A Cuban in Mayberry creatively combines memoir with the intense study of a single television show.

k2-_06202cf0-e0dd-4d1a-825c-7913c3d452d4.v1

Gustavo Pérez Firmat, A Cuban in Mayberry: Looking Back at America’s Hometown, University of Texas Press, 2014, 194 pp.

Living in America as an exile in the forties, Theodor Adorno wrote: “Every intellectual in emigration is, without exception, mutilated and does well to acknowledge it to himself…He lives in an environment that must remain incomprehensible to him…he is always astray” (Minima Moralia, 33). Cuban exile, and Professor of Literature at Columbia University, Gustavo Pérez Firmat echoes something of this sentiment in his book A Cuban in Mayberry, as he describes how the émigré suffers a “strictly irreplaceable” loss of “intimacy between person and place” (12). Attempting to comprehend the ‘incomprehensible,’ Adorno turned his sharp, critical eye on American popular culture which infamously did not fair well. It fairs far better under Pérez Firmat’s analytical gaze. Pérez Firmat posits that the analysis of U.S. pop culture goes some way to alleviating his feeling of displacement. Indeed, he takes refuge in the complex, fictional TV town of Mayberry where its residents – the characters of The Andy Griffith Show (TAGS) – “have never lost their place” (10). Pérez Firmat states: “watching TAGS, I developed a sense of what it must be like to enjoy such intimacy, to feel rooted in the ground under your feet and to know that you live among people who are similarly rooted”(11). Creatively combining memoir with the intense study of a single television show, Pérez Firmat’s book astutely and gracefully analyzes how TAGS, one of the most popular sitcoms in U.S. television history, has managed to turn “millions of Americans and at least one Cuban into Mayberrians” (15). Needless to write, Adorno with his justified suspicion of such cultural hegemony would have hated TAGS. Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books, Reviews